Scoping
Classifying the practice's services and documenting precisely which fall within the activities in scope.
Sectors under AML supervision
Scope attaches to defined activities you carry out for clients, not to holding the professional title.

Independent legal professionals are a designated non-financial business category, but their scope is not absolute — and this is the point most often misunderstood. A lawyer does not carry AML obligations simply by being a lawyer.
Scope arises when carrying out defined activities for a client: managing funds or assets, forming or managing companies, and arranging or disposing of ownership. Litigation and giving legal opinion sit differently.
So our first step is not building the framework but scoping it precisely: which of your services fall inside and which fall outside. Building a framework wider than necessary burdens the practice for nothing.
Classifying the practice's services and documenting precisely which fall within the activities in scope.
Verifying client and beneficial owner identity, specifically for work in scope.
Understanding and documenting the source of funds in work of a financial nature.
Handling the relationship between confidentiality and reporting obligations in a disciplined way — an area that needs clarity set in advance, not improvised in the moment.
Controls over client money accounts where the practice operates them.
Training lawyers and administrators on the indicators, and documenting every due-diligence step.
No. Scope attaches to defined activities. Scoping precisely is the first thing we do, and it saves the practice considerable effort.
Written boundaries are set in advance within the policies, so the team knows when each consideration applies rather than leaving it to judgement in the moment.
Not necessarily. Many practices suit an outsourced arrangement with defined scope, particularly where work in scope is a limited part of their activity.